Prognostics in Battery Health Management

Batteries represent complex systems whose internal state vari- ables are either inaccessible to sensors or hard to measure un- der operational conditions. This work exemplifies how more detailed model information and more sophisticated prediction techniques can improve both the accuracy as well as the re- sidual uncertainty of the prediction in Prognostics and Health Management. The more dramatic performance improvement between various prediction techniques is in their ability to learn complex non-linear degradation behavior from the train- ing data and discard any external noise disturbances. An algorithm that manages these sources of uncertainty well can yield higher confidence in predictions, expressed by narrower uncertainty bounds. We observed that the particle filter approach results in RUL distributions which have better precision (narrower pdfs) by several σs (if approximated as Gaussian) as compared to the other regression methods. How- ever, PF requires a more complex implementation and compu- tational overhead than the other methods. This illustrates the basic tradeoff between modeling and algorithm development versus prediction accuracy and precision. For situations like battery health management where the rate of capacity degrada- tion is rather slow, one can rely on simple regression methods that tend to perform well as more data are accumulated and still predict far enough in advance to avoid any catastrophic failures. Techniques like GPR or even the baseline approach can offer a suitable platform in these situations by managing the uncertainty fairly well with much simpler implementations. Other data sets may allow much smaller prediction horizons and hence require precise techniques like particle filters. In this study, we conclude that there are several methods one could employ for battery health management applica- tions. Based on end user requirements and available resources, a choice can be made between simple or more elegant tech- niques. The particle filter based approach emerges as the winner when accuracy and precision are considered more important than other requirements.

Data and Resources

Additional Info

Field Value
Maintainer Miryam Strautkalns
Last Updated March 31, 2025, 21:38 (UTC)
Created March 31, 2025, 21:38 (UTC)
accessLevel public
accrualPeriodicity irregular
bureauCode {026:00}
catalog_@context https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.jsonld
catalog_@id https://data.nasa.gov/data.json
catalog_conformsTo https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema
catalog_describedBy https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/catalog.json
harvest_object_id c6a5c601-0c8b-4205-8825-16642c8806ec
harvest_source_id 61638e72-b36c-4866-9d28-551a3062f158
harvest_source_title DNG Legacy Data
identifier DASHLINK_681
issued 2013-03-29
landingPage https://c3.nasa.gov/dashlink/resources/681/
modified 2020-01-29
programCode {026:029}
publisher Dashlink
resource-type Dataset
source_datajson_identifier true
source_hash 08cac5a21fba395a41da175619ee37d358318a582ec677f28483ec764d90c73c
source_schema_version 1.1